Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada
So you (in your own words) overdramatize your entire Greek argument to try and float the same old ad nauseam argument that public funding for facilities is bad for cities despite no real evidence that such spending has crippled any city or caused hardship for citizens. I feel like it's the same 6 people constantly arguing this issue and I'm not going to lie, it's annoying.
|
All I am saying is that we are just adding the same debate from CalgaryNEXT to here. It dileneates into an argument for and against spending money on these projects.
Obviously I am not changing my viewpoint on this matter. I think the evidence is out there that these projects do not provide the benefits they suggest. I have relayed that information in the CalgaryNEXT thread. You can choose to dispute that information, which is entirely fine.
I do not think us bringing this argument to this thread is dramatically adding anything but us just re-hashing the same. I'm sure it's annoying to everyone and most people have already made up their mind on this subject so who are we all really trying to convince?
I'm certainly not going to convince you, or New Era, or Enoch, so why bother responding? So I'm not going to anymore.
As soon as something fundamental breaks about CalgaryNEXT we are all just wasting our time, and productivity to try an win an internet fight with people that we don't know and don't really care about.