Quote:
Originally Posted by Tinordi
It's 2016. This denialist talking point is so wrong, dated, and unconvincing. Do you think that the thousands of peer reviewed articles and their reviewers just happened to collectively ignore the role of these natural processes? Seriously. Do you have any idea how climate science works? Evidently no, and therefore you point shall be treated with the same level of scrutiny.
|
It's funny you say that with such certainty though. Take, for instance the new montioring of SO2.
Quote:
Volcano surprise "Initially, I think we maybe thought it wasn't working when we got these huge sources in the middle of the Pacific," McLinden recalled.
Those turned out to be volcanoes — the study found 75 of them emitting substantial amounts of sulphur dioxide, despite the fact that they were dormant and not erupting.
|
http://www.cbc.ca/news/technology/so...tion-1.3610537
So not only are they finding large industrial emitters that are unreported, they are also discovering dormant volcanoes aren't so dormant.
The absolute certainty you and others speak with does a disservice to the science. I'm not discounting what work has been done, but to pretend like we now have all the answers is wrongheaded.