[Bring_Back_Shantz]

Originally Posted by stampsx2

I'm complaining about yet another one added to the list. Nothing wrong with holding the city accountable for it's spending and questioning what they're doing with the publics money.

Except you are handwaving this as a cash grab, and you are against it because you don't see the value in it. Then when people call you out on it, you say "Yeah well people said the same thing about the ring road, and overpasses, and art".

So are you saying that those people are right and that people shouldn't have to pay for services they don't use/see the value in.
Or are you saying that they had invalid points, but even though you are making the same argument that you are somehow justified in doing so.

Because unless I'm missing something, if it isn't one of those, then bringing up those things is completely irrelevant.