View Single Post
Old 05-30-2016, 11:31 AM   #84
GGG
Franchise Player
 
GGG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: California
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hockeyguy15 View Post
Yeah we aren't going to agree on this topic. I'm willing to spend the $6.50 if it's better for the environment in the long run, regardless if it's cheaper or not.
On what grounds is it better for the environment?

I should add that I'm not inherently against doing it. I just want to see a decision record from the city showing the basis for this decision and that it is economicly justifiable based on whole lifecycle costs and the assumptions that went it to it.

Last edited by GGG; 05-30-2016 at 11:38 AM.
GGG is offline   Reply With Quote