Thread: 2016 NHL Draft
View Single Post
Old 05-29-2016, 04:27 PM   #4508
jmac98
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rick M. View Post
Why would you want to add an early 3rd round pick in a draft thought to be thin after pick 45 or 50? I still think you go for BPA at 6.
Assuming Tkatchuk and Dubois are gone, I'd be taking Nylander at 6 myself. Not trading down.

The other fellow was saying he liked Gauthier at 6, and I noted should Calgary want to select him that I wouldn't be upset by it, but I'd like to see them trade down instead of using their 6th for him. I mentioned an early 3rd round just for an example. Picks up an extra pick and you still get your target player. Being in that it's a thin draft, it doesn't hurt to have more selections to aid in discovering one of maybe only a few players that could become legit NHL'ers.
jmac98 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to jmac98 For This Useful Post: