Oh don't get me wrong, Makarov, I completely respect your point, but the bottom line to me is that the whole warrant versus non warrant seems incredibly wide spread and general, and they're not explaining in the bill what they're even enforcing and looking for and it becomes really concerning when the word imprisonment shows up about 20 times in the document.
Its really concerning considering that this is a majority government that can ram this framework through and then addendum the ever loving piss out of it.
Suddenly they want to be able to use the warrantless provinsion to enforce that you can only use certain types of equipment, blammo, they can now search your house and fine you, what does it have to do with the regulation of a carbon tax nothing, but suddenly it becomes a heavy handed environmental bill.
__________________
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;
Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
|