Quote:
Originally Posted by Alberta_Beef
And? That just proves my point further Sutter had a good Kipper, Hartley had a bad one and for less games. My point was you can't just say the teams were the same and Sutter did better when one of the better players for Sutter was a no show the following season. It also ignores that all the veterans never played during the lockout and the team was a step behind from the outset as a result.
But even as bad as Kipper was it is hardly crazy that he could have helped the team get 11 points in 16 more games and end up being better than Joey MacDonald.
|
Ummm, you're all over the place....
"Kipper would have gotten Hartley more points!... except he was bad... which despite being contrary to my assertion proves what I said!... but Kipper would have gotten Hartley more points!"
... frankly I think they're both bad. Butter coached like he had the team he'd like to have rather then the one that he did. His strategies would have worked had he had that team... but he didn't so he failed. Hartley... his straategies were just bad in general (albeit more entertaining then Butter's).