Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root
But there is probably bias in the lists he chose. Cox? Seriously?
Changing out some of the lists for others out there would likely change the picture a bit.
The article over-states the consensus significantly, IMO.
|
I like the writer, he does some great stuff, but his logic is really flawed in this one.
The thing that pops out to me is something like 11 different guys go top 6 in those lists. That isn't a consensus.
The fact that they average to 6 guys being in the mix on most occasions only points to the fact that wild cards aside 6 guys tend to end up in the same place.
Calgary's group is individual. They aren't an average.