View Single Post
Old 05-13-2016, 09:45 AM   #3818
howard_the_duck
#1 Goaltender
 
howard_the_duck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by StrykerSteve View Post
I don't think we're comparing apples to apples here. Pisani was a plug that happened to have a lucky run of pucks bouncing off him or being in the right place at the right time. It came out of nowhere and was completely out of character term for him.

Ignore the 13 starts, Murray has been a stud prospect for a long time now. It was only because he played for Pittsburgh that he wasn't more of a known asset. Ever since he was first mentioned in the same breath as Calgary, people have actually learned more about him. There's a lot to like about this guy and how he plays. Has delivered at every level and dominated in the AHL.

The fact that he's now doing the same thing in the NHL, in the playoffs no less, is pretty awesome, but not even all that surprising, looking at where he's come from to get here.

Don't get me wrong, I don't even think Pitt will entertain trading him at this point, but a few months ago, the approximation of a 2nd and a prospect was probably realistic. Right now though, Pitt would certainly have upped the asking price and the suggestions in here are simply reflective of that fact.

It's my opinion that Calgary needs a solid goalie more than anything else. I'm terrified they'll bring in an aging stopgap, Gillies doesn't pan out, and we are forced to endure a decade of mediocrity, wasting Our young players' best years, just like we did with Iggy.

If trading a 6th pick in an average draft prevents that apocalyptic vision from coming true, I'm all for it.

But above all else, I'm on vacation this week, it's the offseason and I have too much time on my hands.
Pisani comparison was only to illustrate how a hot streak shouldn't cloud judgment. Regardless of pedigree, Murray has a small sample size under his belt to warrant a top 10 pick.

Early indications are Murray is going to be a fantastic goaltender, so I'd jump for joy if the Flames could get their hands on him. But we're also talking about a guy that only a couple of months ago could hypothetically have been had in a return for Kris Russell, or so you saw in many trade proposals from armchair GM's around here.

I'd personally rather part with lesser assets (2nd round picks + prospect) for a guy like Andersen. I'm fully on board with getting a goaltender and using draft picks as currency, just not a top 10 pick.
howard_the_duck is offline  
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to howard_the_duck For This Useful Post: