[undercoverbrother]

Originally Posted by Cecil Terwilliger

Was there something in the article that made you think it was in favour of people driving under the influence?

The point of the article is that current methods being used in jurisdictions where marijuana is legal (or at least medicinally legal) are woefully inadequate and that it requires a unique approach that differs significantly from our traditional alcohol testing.

I'm not sure what exactly you're disagreeing with...

I am not disagree.

I didn't state I was disagreeing.

You posted the article to generate discussion, no?

My contribution was that I don't think they should allow driving under the influence.

There are posters on here that have posted before that that driving while stoned isn't a deficit.

So calm it down.