Quote:
Originally Posted by PsYcNeT
Isn't it a good thing then that we have conflicting opinions among experts? It causes more dialogue and research.
That said, the argument only becomes moot if you choose that as the only word you're willing to take.
The initial article was scientific speculation that the FMM fires may have been caused in part due to climate change.
Also, link?
|
Can we not just hold the opinion that Climate Change is a real issue and needs to be dealt with without blaming every extreme weather event on climate change?
Why do those have to be competing values?