10-01-2006, 08:31 PM
|
#15
|
#1 Goaltender
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by InCoGnEtO
I am not saying I agree totally with the article, but I think I would be ok with it when talking about the worst of the worst....the ones that have kid after kid, the ones that abuse them, physically, sexually and mentally. The ones that neglect the childern right from the get-go. The ones that have no regard for contraception, whatsoever.
Think Ozarks here....12 kids in a one house bedroom, where mom is out at the bar, loaded whilre prego, and getting F'd by random men.
Thats who this is Targetting.....You realize that the childern that come from this kind of family end up having that kind of family. The daugters end up pumping out 10 kids, and so on. These parents end up on welfare, and are a burden on society...
This article is out of South Carolina, so I am sure it is a little more prevelant than we see in Calgary.
I also understand this is a very slippery slope, and would never happen, but with the WORST OF THE WORST, it would be a good thing for society.
|
I don't agree with the idea at all because it is a slippery slope and that is a lot of power to give the government. Having said that..I guess they could sterilize them but keep some eggs and sperm. If they clean up their act and prove that they can handle being parents...then they can be AI'd
|
|
|