Quote:
Originally Posted by NuclearFart
Did you actually read and critically assess some of the original papers and come to this conclusion, or are you just regurgitating what some biased website is telling you? I suspect it's the latter, and this is a prime example how all this holistic/alternative BS gets propagated.
In the absence of official consensus guidelines published by actual experts critically appraising the evidence, what you are proposing is NOT the standard of care. It has nothing to do with "being behind", but everything to do with being safe and efficacious based on what we know. At your proposed doses maybe you're right, maybe you're wrong, maybe it doesn't matter, maybe its a waste of your money, or maybe it's the next thalidomide.
|
I'm not talking about any link I posted. I'm talking about GPs not being up to date in recent research.
Another example? Dietary cholesterol has zero to do with your cholesterol levels. Also, saturated fats aren't nearly as terrible as they were made out to be in the 90s by the low-fat parade.