Quote:
Originally Posted by domenichelly
It means that Treliving do not know who he want to hire? Wow... Just fire Hartley for nothing. If it is so then it is another unclear move by GM... Still think wrong man lost his job.
|
I am always impressed by people who can contort themselves into pretzels.
But no, the claim that the Flames didn't fire Hartley because Boudreau just became available is in no way, shape or form evidence that Treliving "fire[d] Hartley for nothing" or made an "unclear move". It means only that Boudreau's dismissal in Anaheim was not what precipitated Hartley's dismissal here.