The ever increasing melodrama on this board is why I haven't been around much lately.
This thread, which now has 5 pages of responses, is not the "dumbest thread of the year". You can disagree with the premise of the thread and voice your opinion that our GM should in no way be fired, but when the Flames are firing people one year removed from a Jack Adams, it is a fair question to ask.
The Flames seem to have transitioned into win-now mode again and the feeling from the front office appears to signal they believe they have hacked or shortened the rebuild (for the record I disagree).
If we are back in win-now mode, we have to evaluate the GM on that basis. So even if the feeling is that he should be given at least another year to prove himself, the question is reasonable given the shift in emphasis.
|