Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo
Look I thought the Flames were disingenuous with their proposal as well. It was all spin. You can't have the Calgary buildings the oldest but bump others to new because they were renovated, ignoring that the Dome was face lifted as well.
So it's not blunt. It's spin.
They know they have to do something, they know that will cost something. If they can't do it now then say that's an issue, but don't tag the entire cost of the region to the biggest tenant and suggest they were only half right in how much it would cost.
|
I don't think the city was saying that the Flames got it wrong in their evaluation. I think they were saying "look, if this is getting built in WV, we need to do these things as well. This will cost this much so the price tag all in right now is this amount. Its not feasible"
I think them saying they can't do it now is entirely the conclusion that was made, the cost was a part of that conclusion, the timeline another. The City Admin made a report to council. It said this will cost ____. with take until _____. in our analysis, it is not feasible for the city at this time.
The city hasn't made a decision yet.