Quote:
Originally Posted by jammies
Saying you argue LIKE a creationist isn't saying you are a creationist, any more than saying you look LIKE your mother means you are your own mother.
|
The difference in this thread is that I pointed out how the evidence proving the existence of Jesus barely qualified as evidence (if at all).
Belief in creationism is typical of a religious belief (which I am refuting), and the consistent religious belief aligned with creationism is the belief of Jesus. So far not a match with anything I ever typed.
Empirical evidence used in science is basically the opposite type of evidence those in this thread have attempted to push, which were based on reason and rationalism. To claim that I (who pushed empirical evidence) would be a creationist vs those that pushed their rationalistic agenda is not only dishonest, it is completely opposite to what is actually taking place.