Quote:
Originally Posted by KootenayFlamesFan
Pretty much every player that was called up this season looked as good or better than I was expecting. Lots of pleasant surprises. Firing the coach that is at least partially responsible for that really doesn't make any sense to me.
|
Several people have made this argument.
The problem with it, for me, is that there is no benchmark to make any kind of comparison. You (and others) say the prospects that have come up have looked good. And for the most part I agree.
But what does that mean? Could they have been better? Of course. Could they have been worse? Certainly.
My point is: HOW good have they been? Can we say that Huska have elevated their readiness? How much credit does he deserve here?
All I'm saying is: how can we tell from this metric?