Thread: [Game Takes] Kings 4 Flames 3 (OT)
View Single Post
Old 04-06-2016, 02:06 PM   #12
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by heep223 View Post
I've said this before but in the cap era I think it's completely unrealistic to have 6 actual top 6 forwards. If you look at how most teams are built these days they have pairs of top 9 forwards that play together and they rotate other guys through when they find chemistry. You just can't pay 6 actual top 6 forwards in today's era.

So the Flames have:

Gaudreau/Monahan
Bennett/2016 Draft Pick
Backlund/Frolik

Ie. you have Ferland, Colborne, Shinkaruk, Bouma, Jooris rotating up and through this lineup until chemistry is found for a while. You hope that some prospects like Poirier, Jankowski can step up and become top 9 NHLers.

With the addition of this year's pick, assuming he can step in and play top 6 next season (which is a big assumption) but at least for the following season, actually the top 9 is looking really good with where things stand. Maybe you try to add 1 top six forward but I think it's completely unrealistic to say that this team needs 2 more top 6 forwards to complete the group. That would create possibly the best forward group in the NHL and especially with how much cap the Flames have committed on the blueline is just unrealistic.
I agree completely with this. I see it to be entirely possible that two of Ferland, Shinkaruk and Colborne can play top 6 with the skilled pairings already there (assuming a top-level winger in the draft).

If the guy they draft isn't NHL ready yet, I suppose they will need to either make do with all three guys or get a stopgap.
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to GioforPM For This Useful Post: