Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada
I would live to put those videos side by side and get the NHL to explain why the play where there's considerable contact in the crease is considered a good goal while the other which is basically a perfect screen play with little or no contact is not a goal. I don't think they could come up with an answer to defend themselves based on comparing the two videos. They basically got both calls wrong so there's really no point in reviewing the goals if you cant get the reviews correct.
|
I agree that Oilers call was bad. Both should be no goals though. Colborne was in the crease and Quick's head couldn't move and made contact with Colborne. Text book no goal.