Quote:
Originally Posted by Poe969
You're making it sound too simple. If the only time something was questionable was when either a ref or a concussion were involved, there would be a set of suspensions for set infractions. I have a feeling that Keith will say that there was no intent and it was an accident and he should have only got a penalty and not suspension.
|
It will be pretty hard for him to argue that. He looked right at Coyle, when he hit him.
And just for fun since it was such a big deal with Wideman, at no point did Keith look back at Coyle after he did it. If he didn't mean to do it why not turn around and look concerned he just hit the guy?