Quote:
Originally Posted by ricardodw
Why didn't you make a similar post under FDW's post:
I read that FDW expressed his opion that at age 21 Lindholm's chances of being a #1C were very small. There are a lot of posters that have put the similar aged Jankowski's potential as a 1C or 2c . FDW might have expressed that opinion on other threads.
Comparing same age players, was an effort to explain my support for having Lindholm becoming a #1C like Monahan?
Perhaps you were cheering on the Jets and missed the long pre-draft discussion on the merits of Lindholm/Monahan rather than being a Keep it on topic hall-monitor here at CP.
But again why did you not make the same comment on FDW's post that was every bit as on or off topic as mine?
|
He said in the very post you quoted that Lindhom is a good player and will be a very good 2nd line centre or a lower tier first line one. How is that under-selling him to the point where you quoted that and just regurgitated facts about Lindholm? I don't even understand how or why you are arguing with him? It makes no sense, which is why I asked how you use that as a jumping off point to spout Lindholm facts like someone slighted him?
You seem to think I took issue with you for being off topic. It's because it seems *every* topic escapes you, and you use sheer randomness to go off on warped tangents, bringing up players you randomly dislike and using it as an opportunity to rant about them. This was another perfect example of that, and why people are generally left bewildered by you.