IIRC, Agostino was somewhere in the 'teens' for Pittsburgh in their prospect pool at the time of the trade (might have been close to 20th on their list).
Pollock was in the top 10 for Dallas from the stuff I read.
Now, that doesn't necessarily mean that Pollock > Agostino. What it does mean is that Pollock was a more valuable prospect to Dallas than Agostino was to Pittsburgh. Treliving was able to extract a more important prospect organizationally than Feaster was.
|