In this case you might be right about arguing for the sake of it - I initially recoiled at what was a clearly wrong statement about how income tax works, and have now been defending that against further misunderstandings on your part for a couple of pages now. I do think he's doing this to save some money (not necessarily entirely income tax related, but probably a lot to do with income taxes). However, it doesn't follow from that that Canada suddenly loses all of its Murray Edwards related tax revenue, or anything close to that. That was my problem. I feel like we're going back and forth over this for no reason.
__________________
"The great promise of the Internet was that more information would automatically yield better decisions. The great disappointment is that more information actually yields more possibilities to confirm what you already believed anyway." - Brian Eno
|