Quote:
Originally Posted by Flamescuprun2018
Source: http://www.matchsticksandgasoline.co...mark-jankowski
Interesting perspective not to sign Jankowski.
The 4 year progression of Jankowski would suggest otherwise especially considering his young age as a 4 year college player. His birthdate made him eligible for the 2011 draft by mere days (Sept 15th was the cutoff). (DOB: September 13, 1994)
I presume Mark was injured this past week limiting his icetime in recent overtime games. |
Yep and Gaudreau is way too small to play in the NHL. My point is this guy is so negative and that is because Jankowski did not a point per game until his senior year doesn't make him a bust and Flames shouldn't sign him. He even mentioned he is not a top 6 forwards. Duh, i think the Flames know that. He is going to be a two-way centreman who is slotted for 3rd or 4th line. I think it is a bonus if he can play as a 4th line centre and his line can contribute on both sides of the ice. Maybe if he plays in the NHL next season he can play alongside an energy and also a two-way player Garnet Hathaway. I still think the Flames will make him play his first pro season in Stockton next season.