Quote:
Originally Posted by MattyC
Saying he didn't deserve to, to me, implies that he was innocent. Especially when you frame it that they tried to put him there, undeservedly. He could very much deserve to be there, but their testimony tanked any notion of that happening.
He shouldn't go to prison based on the trial, and the judge made the right call. What he "deserves" is still up for debate, because the truth of the situation hasn't been fully realized. All that's been realized is that there was inconsistency in the complainants' testimonies. It has nothing to do with what he deserves.
|
Sorry, but until we have some means of determining what people "deserve", the only determination of what he "deserves" is what the judge decided.