Quote:
Originally Posted by 2Stonedbirds
Are we not already able to have a plant or two without criminal charges? I'm not sure. But I seriously doubt the govt would allow such a thing. They are not gonna look at it from a convenience standpoint, or a potency standpoint, they will only view that as...
"Giving people the ability to grow their own means they will and that equals zero for the tax income."
Potency isn't something the govt can only achieve anyways. I read an article years ago about a govt operated grow up in Saskatchewan, and the clients quit getting their dope from there, and were back purchasing from their "buddy." They had enough complaints they actually contacted and brought in people with previous cultivation charges so they could teach our public employees how to grow dope worth smoking.
Never mind the fact that some people who cultivate will carry on doing so because they enjoy it. Like grandma and her tomato plants, it's a hobby.
|
Yeah it depends on how it's distributed/regulated. If it's basically a centralized industry, then the quality would probably end up suffering.
If it's privatized, however, hold onto your f***ing hat. If there's one thing privatization will do, it would spark a pretty tough fight for who can produce the best stuff.