View Single Post
Old 03-23-2016, 01:35 PM   #141
bizaro86
Franchise Player
 
bizaro86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by polak View Post
Luxemberg, Norway and Switzerland are tiny countries that could fit in Alberta. It's unrealistic for people to expect Canada to be able to provide the standard of living we have come to expect, to it's tiny population over such a massive area of land and such a harsh climate without accumulating debt.

Do you think infrastructure grows on trees?
So are Iceland and Belgium, and they both have higher debt loads than Canada, so quality of governance obviously matters. Also, Australia is pretty darn big and their debt is very low.

Most of the deficit spending in this budget isn't infrastructure, which was my point. Deficit spending on infrastructure is very different than deficit spending on ongoing programs and entitlements.

Last edited by bizaro86; 03-23-2016 at 01:41 PM.
bizaro86 is offline   Reply With Quote