Quote:
Originally Posted by Imported_Aussie
I think it comes down to expectations. If he was a clear cut top 6 forward, there is no way he would have been available, let alone for a 4th round pick. When he was brought in, right away it was said he would be a valuable 3rd line guy as his likely peak. But due to the transitional nature of this roster, he has too often been played above his head.
I feel he has had enough good moments, and in this division, size is needed.
He plays on the periphery at times, then he plays a strong game in the playoffs last year. I don't think we know yet what we have in Colborne, and being that he is RFA, a "show-me" deal with the incentive being to cash in when he hits UFA may be a good move.
Obviously, if he is the piece needed in a trade to address the top 6, you make that deal, but I think he still has utility on this roster.
And back to Backlund - I think he is a good player to pair with Colborne, as he plays a good, solid game, and Colborne bring the size to that line which would be asked to match up on big pacific lines
I also see the Backlund unit as 3rd line, but a better description may be 2B - with Bennett still growing into his role and likely another young top end prospect being brought on, I would think the lines would have similar amounts of ice time, but having the 2B line means you can control the younger group's zone starts and matchups
|
I get that he brings some elements to the table with his size and shootout skills. If he is actually limited to that third line role and not bouncing around between the PP and second line I think fans will be less inclined to want him back at all to be honest.
I don't see the willingness to compete like Backlund/Frolik consistently do in his game. If he dedicates himself to continue playing like he has the last few games then I might start thinking differently. As it stands now I believe this is simply another blip on his radar that makes us all think we have more than we do in him. I've seen it too many times.