Quote:
Originally Posted by Resurrection
Without reading the full arbitration and the subsequent ruling, the arbitrators substitution of a lesser but severe penalty doesn't jive with an accident. That kind of inconsistency can lead to a judge to overrule an arbitration from my own experience. One of many reasons, of course. But that jumps to mind.
|
So if you were to read the ruling and agree with my personal assessment that the arbitrator thinks he did do it on purpose but reduced the suspension to 10 games because he doesn't think Wideman hit him with intent to injure (this is a pretty gross simplification), would you still think they should go to the courts?