Quote:
Originally posted by Lurch@Oct 29 2004, 06:14 PM
Quote:
|
It's interesting that in this thread we have one reporter, Dana Lewis of NBC News, a Canadian no less, saying nothing was at the ammo site and a Minneapolic crew saying there was. An obvious contrast and debate.
|
Are the two comparable? The Minneapolis crew has actual footage, not hearsay. Seems like a slam-dunk on credibility if you ask me - though in the interest of fairness, I must admit my pre-existing hope that this IS in fact on Bush. The weapons are missing regardless, so I'd much rather see it pinned on Bush than explained away.
|
In all honesty, I don't care if its pinned on Bush either. I said in another thread on the matter its just one more thing in a line of mismanagement of the post-conflict in Iraq.
If its true.
The argument that its true is the Minneapolis footage. There's also an argument that its tough to move hundreds of tons of something without a long train of trucks being a dead giveaway.
But its also obvious there was a ton of stuff that went unguarded in the aftermath. There aren't many arguing the Bush camp hasn't been poor stewards in the war's aftermath.
Cowperson