Quote:
Originally Posted by Oling_Roachinen
No of course not. I never suggested that. But the lengthy delay in them coming to a decision goes to emphasis that this was not a clear cut obvious decision.
|
More people on the "suspend him for a long time" side were of the view that it was clear cut and obvious than those who thought "accidental" IMO.
I've seen court decisions over a lot more money than this take way less time. Especially when it was a pressing issue.
The amount of time suggests to me it will be upheld, because otherwise there'd be urgency.