Quote:
Originally Posted by VladtheImpaler
Pfff, insurance flunkie.  My take hasn't changed since earlier in the thread. The Occupiers Liability Act does not distinguish between invited visitors and trespassers as far as the standard of care. The difference between the tiger and this is that here the danger is hidden (apparently). Slava was right on point with that snowmobile example. I wouldn't say any injury lawyers are licking their chops to represent people in this case - this will be a tough case and there is not that much money in it ( saying that I have no idea how injured the survivors are). Much easier ways to make money. The weir example doesn't as there is a different (tougher) standard for suing a municipality. I am really not going to look into this in any depth, unless someone actually wants to hire me... I think that covers it. |
The two injured that I know about, it sounds like they have permanently life altering injuries. I don't know them personally, but I get email updates as part of an organization.