Quote:
Originally Posted by Barnes
That's not what I said. Your convenient clipping of my post changed the meaning but my overall intention may not have been clear.
|
It is what you said.
I got your intention (and I actually completely agree with it)... but it's still silly to hope that it comes out expensive. CS&E funding model as it's presented is quite dishonest (as is the fact that they present 100% public ownership as a positive aspect of their proposal). That's true regardless of whether the environmental assessment says it costs $5.00 or $500,000,000.00. I'm opposed to the funding model as is currently known and the environmental assessment won't change that.