Forcing news channels to do anything is a problem. Again, whose facts? Some hypothetical completely non partisan committee you'll create to decide what gets reported? In the real world your idea comes with biases and interests, people and money, and an agenda is getting pushed one way or another.
You don't like the current state of popular journalism, got it. Are you going to censor the internet as well? Force websites to only post what you deem appropriate? It's a silly idea that is impossible to implement and one that neglects to grasp the whole "freedom of the press" thing we have in the free world.
|