Quote:
Originally Posted by SebC
Positional need is by definition not part of BPA. Arguing so just muddles up terminology and makes communication more difficult. It's like arguing that 'literally' means 'figuratively'. You might win but you've just made our language worse.
|
I'll assume you were referring to my comments so I'll respond. It's never as simple as BPA. The BPA to me might be different than the BPA to you. So figuratively, when I'm an NHL GM looking at my list, and I value a good character centre with a strong shot over a speedy winger who dangles, the position plays into BPA.