Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community - View Single Post

IgiTang · 03-02-2016, 04:05 PM

If we were drafting by need, we would be taking g a goalie in the top 10..

I always cringe when a goalie goes top 60. I'm sure there are tons of reasons why you take certain goalies but honestly, Tokarski, Subban and others along that line concern me. Sure you could get a Martin Brodeur (career starting G goalie who can carry a team to a cup) but that is becoming a Unicorn IMO.

I like it when teams pick goalies after 30, preferably after 60.

That said, BPA unless Need is real close to BPA and that's when you trade down.

03-02-2016, 04:05 PM	#9
IgiTang Self-Retired Join Date: Oct 2006 Exp:	If we were drafting by need, we would be taking g a goalie in the top 10.. I always cringe when a goalie goes top 60. I'm sure there are tons of reasons why you take certain goalies but honestly, Tokarski, Subban and others along that line concern me. Sure you could get a Martin Brodeur (career starting G goalie who can carry a team to a cup) but that is becoming a Unicorn IMO. I like it when teams pick goalies after 30, preferably after 60. That said, BPA unless Need is real close to BPA and that's when you trade down.