Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community - View Single Post

ken0042 · 03-01-2016, 12:01 PM

That's why turn of the centuries are not leap years; unless the turn of the century is divisible by 400.

So 2000 was a leap year, but 1900 was not; nor will 2100.

03-01-2016, 12:01 PM	#52
ken0042 Playboy Mansion Poolboy Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Close enough to make a beer run during a TV timeout Exp:	That's why turn of the centuries are not leap years; unless the turn of the century is divisible by 400. So 2000 was a leap year, but 1900 was not; nor will 2100.