Quote:
Originally Posted by Locke
Who wouldnt? That makes total sense and I'm surprised its even a discussion.
Russell: 28 years old, durable, shotblocking top 4 dman good for 15-30 points.
Hamhuis: 33 years old, soft, top 4 dman good for 20-30 points.
|
It was kind of interesting watching the two shows yesterday.
On TSN, they were pretty universal in thinking that Hamhuis was the better player - some by a wide margin.
And on Sportsnet, they were more in agreement that Russell was the better player. I think it was John McLean that said: it isn't really close.
Very polarizing.