View Single Post
Old 02-28-2016, 08:46 AM   #66
mdubz
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Lethbridge
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ricardodw View Post
the Flames have no leverage with Russell. It is pretty obvious that having spent 17M on their top 3 D-men plus having Wideman's 5M for 1 more year that the Flames will no be resigning Russell. With Iginla there definitely was the option of the Flames keeping him so he could retire as a Flame.

At the very best Russell will be the #4 D-man on the Flames.

As the teams wait it out and Hamhuis is still out there the clock is ticking and the late 2nd or 3rd round picks that may have been out there are being down graded.

The other teams in the league are going to take advantage of the Cap problems the Flames have gotten themselves into.
How do our cap problems have anything to do with Russell's value as a rental?
mdubz is offline   Reply With Quote