Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames Draft Watcher
I'm pondering this question again.
In my opinion Ladd >> Hudler >>> Schultz and here's why.
1st + Dano is approximately equal to two 2nds and two 4ths and therefore approximately equal to twice Hudler. Especially when you think where CHI's 1st is.
IMO 2nd + 4th > two 3rds and therefore Hudler is equal more than twice what Schultz got. Sometimes you'll see a team trade two 3rds for a 2nd but having the 4th rounder in there makes the 2nd + 4th more valuable than the two 3rds.
So Ladd gets approximately twice what Hudler gets and Hudler gets more than twice as much as Schultz IMO.
|
Sure.
But if we had this conversation prior to the trades and asked: where does Hudler fit on a scale of 1 to 10, where 1 is Schultz and 10 is Ladd, I think most people would say 8 or 9, not 5.
That's my point. Hudler's return shouldn't be halfway between Ladd and Schultz, it should be about 80% towards Ladd.