Quote:
Originally Posted by pylon
And although I prey it doesn't happen, I would be really interested to see the stance his sympathizers have, if he ditches his meds, and kills again.
|
We're deferring to neutral experts who have been educated, trained and have years of experience in dealing with persons with mental illnesses. No one is just willynilly saying "eh, he's probably good to go." If he reoffends, sure we absolutely need to reevaluate the process, see what could be changed, what went wrong, if there was any negligence etc. But what in the case that he doesn't reoffend? What if this is the case of a man who is remorseful for the actions he had no control over, who is mentally stable and healthy now and only wants to get back and try to live as close to a normal life as possible and is capable of doing so? What type of sick mentality does it take to deny that?
And just how many other situations would you prefer to rely on a vocal biased uneducated public opinion opposing the neutral experts and doctors? That's how we ended up with worse teeth than Edmonton. Let the doctors decide when he's ready.