Quote:
Originally Posted by CorsiHockeyLeague
Look at how utterly shocked I am. This just strikes me as one of those things that is not a real, actual problem but a simplistic point of opposition dreamed up by people who are generally opposed to the concept of transgender rights. It reminds me of the people who opposed gay marriage because "next someone's going to try to marry a tree". No, no one is actually going to do that.
That being said, here's a question: instead of assuming that the sign on the door refers to gender, why can't we instead assume it refers to sex? Why would this be an objectionable way to resolve this silly "problem"? Human beings remain a sexually dimorphic species. Gender identity does not change this. I'm serious, this is my proposed solution, unless someone can give me a good explanation for why it's a bad one.
|
No you're wrong, someone absolutely is going to try and do that.
The key is to let them do their thing without allowing it to bother you.
If you're opposed to hot foliage luvin then you have to learn to just let it go rather than try and stop them.
__________________
The Beatings Shall Continue Until Morale Improves!
This Post Has Been Distilled for the Eradication of Seemingly Incurable Sadness.
The World Ends when you're dead. Until then, you've got more punishment in store. - Flames Fans
If you thought this season would have a happy ending, you haven't been paying attention.
|