Quote:
Originally Posted by Lanny_MacDonald
The UN should be the world police. The police force should come from all walks of life and there should be no restriction to that force. Also, the police should be fair and impartial. When they are not the society they oversee disintegrates into chaos. Any police action that takes place should be a body made up of representatives from around the globe that are considered impartial on the disagreement. The leadership of the police should be an agreed to party from both sides of the altercation and there should be a binding agreement that what this leadership group says is law. That's how policing works, not the bull**** solution of "who ever has the biggest gun" like you suggest.
As to nuclear weapons, no country has the "moral responsibility" to have these weapons. When I hear people like yourself natter on and on about who has the right and responsibility to have such weapons it scares the hell out of me. Brainwashed idiots who believe they have the moral high ground based on economic factors have the control over weapons that can kill millions. I do not see how that differs from the brainwashed idiots who believe they have the moral high ground based on religiosity. You should also not talk morals when you talk about America and England. Neither government has morals IMO.
|
I do agree that the UN should be the world police but that is impossible when you consider they have no means of enforcement unfortunately. Someone needs to come up with a better system.