You know I will say one thing. Sure the text was dumb but I doubt that Wideman knew his phone records could be subpoenaed either. It's incredibly invasive for this sort of process, for any judicial or administrative process really. Normally you would have to establish relevance and probative value of the records in order to compel records like that. Or I wonder if Wideman was asked and said he was fine with it not realizing what he had sent and his lawyers then agreed. I would never agree to disclosing phone records unless the other side had some evidentiary basis to establish they were relevant.
|