The other part of the report that I didn't like was how he quoted rule 40, where the action needs to be deliberate. He says that Wideman deliberately did that. Then, he dismisses the doctors saying they could not actually know Wideman's state of mind at the time, they were just making guesses.
So which is it Gary? Either you cannot know what Wideman is thinking, and therefore its hard to say it was deliberate, or you should have given more credit to the doctor's testimony. Nice to have it both ways.
__________________
Much like a sports ticker, you may feel obligated to read this
|