The alternate view is that GHG's aren't as bad as the doomsayers say, and our continual evolution of energy sources will pretty much take care of the issue within 50-100 years anyway. Honestly I'm more concerned about real pollution that GHG's, and think they do much more harm to the planet. The beneficial side effect of cutting coal for GHG reductions is that you clean up a lot of that air pollution. But not nearly enough is done on other issues like fertilizer runoff and factory pollution.
/I know. flame suit on.
|