Quote:
Originally Posted by VladtheImpaler
Jammies, Ghomeshi's narrative is irrelevant - there is no narrative as far as the Court is concerned, unless he testifies. There is the Crown's narrative, and if that doesn't establish beyond a reasonable doubt that he (Gomeshi) did something against the law, there is no need for his narrative to be presented at all. The Court can guess what that narrative is based upon the cross of the Crown witnesses, but there is no Gomeshi narrative to be believed or disbelieved.
|
So does that mean he probably won't testify?