Quote:
Originally Posted by peter12
No, but if you are suggesting they weren't exposed to the hazards of the track at some point during their employment, then you are exercising some pretty sentimental thinking on their behalf.
|
Zero sentimental thinking here. It's a logical critique of your statement.
You are the one that suggested that two of them would have had the information available to conduct an accurate risk assessment when clearly that is not the case.
When in fact the complete opposite to your statement is far closer to the truth in that if they had the information available that there was a barrier on the course they would not have set foot on the course.