Quote:
Originally Posted by troutman
|
Shocking that a blog based on traditional medicine would attack anything that runs counter to traditional medicine. I would think that traditional medicine would follow the scientific method and study the theory. There is something to what this "quack" said, and it was supportive of research completed in Alberta.
https://uofa.ualberta.ca/news-and-ev...ancertreatment
I'm a skeptic of most things, but when it comes to disease I don't think we shouldn't be locked into any box. Hell, we're looking at every mold, spore or fungus in the Amazon as possible cures for everything, so why is this so crazy? What this quack says kind of makes some sense when looking for cures. You look at cancer clusters and try and figure out a cause. He's suggesting the opposite, looking at where these diseases don't exist and then trying to figure out why it doesn't exist where it should. All he's doing is working the equation backward. This is an accepted way of finding solutions, so I applaud the guy for doing something different. I'm not sure his research will stand up to review, but I think it is disingenuous to discount the research without doing the peer review. I mean, it would suck to see a possible treatment or cure go by the wayside because it didn't meet the expectations of the establishment. Attack away!